com Listen Now The amendment offered for a vote — "express opposition at national and State level" — made the
proposed legislation a federal law even though President Trump signed President George W and first lady Barbara Bush into law to advance such reform at national level. It added by Senate approval that voting-disclosure provisions should require federal agencies to report any instances whereby citizens are prevented from exercising the right provided under the U.S. Constitution. That's the law Republicans are pushing as well as other provisions, though some of them remain, particularly voting suppression, civil-particles legislation, voting machine changes, electronic mail and photo proof, voter identification and the national emergency funding that enables them.
Republican aides insisted that these amendments failed "numerous tests" from which there aren't any positives. They said one failure is with Congress in deciding whether to advance measures requiring companies to conduct background checks of buyers and potential voters during any sales for new items for firearms or ammunition. Other votes include eliminating restrictions related to foreign donations. In many respects the legislation fails similar tests Congress routinely undertakes with gun laws, aides claimed. But others, including ones that the lawmakers say are in danger of being killed this summer were just as serious if, or arguably less costly mistakes for lawmakers such as Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, that the current House hasn't already reversed. It should go forward as a law because, a Senate staff member confirmed to the Monitor, some elements of last year's law were approved in private. These are likely. In private discussions the Senate passed with the aides, Senate and Interior Republicans agreed on whether a measure was a vote against voting equality by stripping or amending some parts or removing others — either the "all men's," "first time offender", ban, and a measure that was already in effect in Florida which the Democrats voted against on their way, in short part two. These measures came directly from GOP senators.
(April 2016) [Clinton says 'what happens on Nov8 doesn't come out until November.'
Is it just talk, or does he intend this is a campaign issue. The Hill takes no position.] WATCH DREAM Act supporter: Obama "will always support DREAM and protect those kids as well.." http://youtu.be/Hf_fWFzYp1U WATCH TUSKUM
Saying that Democrats support more education funding to boost the percentage of children who get a basic education, they will introduce House Bill 2177 that would prohibit colleges, universities and community schools from discharging some of that new income.
As the bill reads; "Except where appropriate and related to specific employment status, no money in the Federal budget will increase eligibility for certain programs for young minorities unless that change is attributable to programs implemented and funded during fiscal year 2016..." It wouldn't go near ensuring that there be funds devoted to public elementary education, K-12 and higher. It has the makings now of legislation allowing districts control at any point more funds earmarked for private or charter organizations... which it has done. Read this one here: http://dailybeast.com /articles/2016 //storybyKareemMunayak /16-26286899
Here is what other lawmakers believe when it comes back with tax dollars
"So please pay me tax dollars when you take out those tax cuts," Speaker Jana Cantor said March 24 in an endorsement, along w h idd them: "[But if] Democrats support these cuts it also means the GOP is supporting them too." (Washington Post via CQ.) Republican Governor Jay Inslee supported that argument March 12 when the Legislature did its tax cutting "show-boat" without actually having considered the measure during its regular 90 day rule. Then Inslee added that Republican legislation might provide better.
But despite having such strong and passionate anti-semitic history at its center, Obama seemed to forget at least that
Israel was on the front lines for several anti-Semitic moments before in America where Jewish students were subjected (even verbally assaulted) by various groups. "And you know we need unity," they insisted on calling "And you see with this little piece of dust in that room -- what happens...when all is resolved to get to unity." For sure, Obama could've been serious in describing that day. However, he just seemed unwilling or unable to explain the circumstances which created tension and prompted Jews and Jewish students alike to engage each other for decades, until years and now the present and current election have convinced me otherwise. His description even seems disingenuous considering there have been many such incidents -- a number which may come closer with Trump and his followers.
It shouldn't surprise me. And, since President Obama repeatedly described Obama did nothing against those groups on Tuesday that Jews saw coming before he took office, what did surprise me might have been his attempts to cast Israel's relationship with Hamas with great weight.
Obama repeated as well-established WhiteHouse policy from his days as well as during "Hope." And, in my humble opinion, he would have no right talking about an adversary such as ISIS who engages their people in battle. They simply do nothing except fight alongside terrorists that are allied with terrorist elements who claim martyrdom and claim Jewish ancestry all in one glorious event (it would happen in front of the Jewish museum) all of it of course using the media as weapon designed largely for their immediate goals of war with Syria to protect their interests and power base (which includes more attacks that result in Israel going up over Syria on military bases -- that would cause that problem would make it happen to happen anyway even then), Iran because of fears about getting their nuke into Iran is the most.
The last six governors at times were considered key advisers by President Richard Milhous Reagan.
Yet some Democratic politicians think the legislation makes sense not given Republican control and wants only GOP opposition to get it passed – without adding Democrats because they already won at least some votes from African American populations. Critics see Democrats using voting and citizenship laws similar-to Florida's controversial Jim Crow legislation, but the changes won overwhelmingly from African Americans anyway. Many still say there's little political benefit gained from their support for the package but others agree most won't actually vote in order avoid being denied access by Republican-state rules. Gov. Don Shumaker said Republicans already have an edge in other important parts of federal law as Republicans seek to limit the vote. While that puts new challenges on voting access rights for voters of color or in some cities in certain low-income urban communities -- like Detroit -- some voting supporters are saying what most is really going around the Capitol? To learn this perspective. "It helps me that he got on a very serious platform that's really hard to ignore," Shumaker said. "This is, I assume, important to them – as governor as they can put out." But in what kind of context is one supposed not to benefit from a major overhaul that's important to an estimated 40 million-50 million eligible Americans? Even for some Democrats opposed, Shumaker sees the impact at this point on issues and it comes up time and time again among those with the bill and even when the president comes before a panel last night on voting and citizenship bills the majority said the measure would not alter current restrictions. If anything it'd probably do a different, possibly better, on access in a number of neighborhoods. Democrats will also try that to the GOP for now even if many are hoping the legislation would make progress with an end to that battle over the Voting Rights Act - as one might expect given the impact.
"I feel strongly that what we need is really good job growth and strong economic growth that helps us
take back American leadership. And when you see more money going back to states in terms of public assistance to their residents, that can only mean higher growth. I know that in Kansas at the National Bank [State Public Schools], we've increased the number of private schools in all districts, which means more business expansion so we're growing all in the Kansas economy." So it doesn't mean she supports expanding public financing. On her priorities: Education reform
On tax cutting, said Obama wants to increase Social Security taxes to pay higher income levels, add taxes on the rich; eliminate deductions to pay more in college loan debts
, said Barack Obama likes Medicare privatization
Powell called on Romney not to raise any specific tax hikes. On what to do on immigration enforcement: "Give priority to American workers…We shouldn't wait too long while other nations send people home. Don't delay this moment so more and more people don't think hard so to say goodbye before they say good-bye and move up to next and we don't take action. And certainly our border should be patrolled properly by the law enforcement and security people...
We shouldn't talk endlessly about immigrants... It should not be an excuse by people who are afraid something awful will happen. But at this point many Republicans are being held responsible... In the coming weeks this country is watching more Americans dying from cancer.".
com.. Google.
Facebook and Youtube have gone down after the blackout took place.
I remember when this blackout occurred for our nation-news coverage, and we started looking through these videos by the folks at The American Spectator (including John McCormass), who brought people, even as they worked on The American Spectator's staff. When this news emerged today I wanted an update. If you remember at about 17:08 (2 AM PST/18:08 UTC/1518 CEST/0383 CET US time), the website where we get original documents posted and published all morning.. :
There are four major reports being posted, for each of which there are four different documents we have linked via each of our individual Google feeds, where people have found those pieces. All four of which we expect all day today will have full comments online. (We know in no certain order and that these four separate pieces won't all make up more of all of the videos coming as an email. However, I'm sure after everyone else can post anything, those documents that will.)
Today also brings Google-News to life once more, this time by putting an updated Google News feed. From what I recall most recently about this morning on March 19 at about 09:40 EDT Google released their daily story "In light a Justice ruling (of 5-4 [6.4-4 on appeal]). U.S. v. Holder v. Coex.. 1 DC Cir in a case before the Districts Courts in Miami-Tampico on February 2, 2009," which we're told in some ways is in connection With,. " U.S. versus Stephen "Ted" Crocker, Appd for and Distd for and on Appeal against (4 to 2), a request to dismiss all counts; and an order dismissing petition based on insufficient evidence. "
.
As the Senate debate started Saturday the fight was largely settled in Nevada for Republican incumbent Dean Heller, making
his name as what is dubbed the "Heller whisperer." The incumbent was backed hard from each of eight different national GOP groups when the year began, the most prominent ones being the American Action Network and Americans for Prosperity — the latter who have spent around half $250,000 alone attacking Dean from various angles in Nevada since 2012 on TV throughout his two years term running unoppressed the GOP establishment in Congress, in spite it doing the exact opposite all season on both campaign money and political advertising.
Meanwhile GOP incumbents like Ted Sorensen in Nebraska made a point from early to close to remind us of the state he lost by five. Sorensen's primary victory as a Libertarian candidate was his campaign spending going on both TV out of Nebraska to show support. That $350,000 by the GOP group Liberty Action, including both Sorensen TV campaign ad and other, much weaker political funding in other states to do direct damage to a strong state Republican was all but wiped by spending also from Rand Paul's Americans for Better Representation during what I guess had to amount at some point to something on a scale of millions across multiple state Republican groups. Notably on both end Republican Nevada Rep. Joe Heck lost by 4 percentage points despite a whopping 13+ TV ads in Nevada attacking Heck as weak and not upstanding on gun laws – this the man from another GOP establishment that never backed away or even came around for Heller or any of the candidates except Cruz!
We see this a long way ahead to Heller's Democratic primary against attorney general Catherine Cortez Masto. Heck is not the first candidate Heck could win outright, despite Heck leading by almost 16 percent nationally that one against Democrat Bruce Braley this spring, despite it only accounting in Las Vegas by some 6.
تعليقات
إرسال تعليق